Page 33 - IRMSA Risk Report 2023
P. 33

ALEX HETHERINGTON





                   6.5     INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY



                           Furthering this  idea,  Alex Hetherington from Third Line Group reinforces  the
                           need for well-researched scenario analysis. He explains that this allows threats and
                           opportunities to be identified to build resilience. An example is how the investment
                           community is increasingly measuring the future worth of a company in terms of its
                           climate-change response. This may be an indicator of a shift in thinking around
                           risk, specifically in terms of climate change but potentially opening into a broader
                           expression.

                           Hetherington diagnoses the response to climate change as a measure of how much
                           one has been exposed to its effects.  In this sense, it shows that negative risk analysis
                           as a reactive discipline presents a risk.

                           Professor Mohale reiterates that “Understanding risk and its management is not just
                           about trying to anticipate the future – it’s about the level of preparedness. It’s about
                           exercising the mental muscle to ensure that, when we are hit with something that we
                           didn’t anticipate – like we were blindsided by the pandemic, like we were hit with the
                           two weeks in July, like we were hit by the floods in KwaZulu-Natal during Easter and
                           again during May – that you have gone through a process [and] you’ve got a system
                           of dealing, of anticipating, of responding.”

                           Palm expands on the idea of integrated risk assessment by relying on expert
                           knowledge: “My advice would be to listen to the people who know; the strategists, risk
                           professionals and futurists. You’ve got to involve them and leverage their contributions
                           when integrating the strategy, risk, and resilience conversations. Governing bodies
                           can benefit from at least considering their recommendations and how it would play
                           out when put into action – i.e., considering different futures. Building alternatives and
                           robustly stress testing them so when a quick, complex decision is need, alternatives
                           are available.

                           Lawangee emphasises the need for agility: “Think of this as our own organisation.
                           There’s the ‘fail-fast’ mentality where if an employee’s attempt at something doesn’t
                           work out, you fail fast and move on to the next thing. Failure can be a very good
                           teacher.  I  think  that  type  of  environment  allows  you  to  be  more agile  and  more
                           responsive to risk that you can’t foresee on an excel spreadsheet – otherwise people
                           will just be paralysed and won’t know what to do.”


















              IRMSA RISK REPORT 2023/24                                                                   33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38